Czechia vs Sweden: GDP
GDP over time
- Czechia
- Sweden
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 6.48 trillion constant LCU against 5.47 trillion constant LCU in Sweden, a difference of 1.01 trillion constant LCU.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 53rd and Sweden ranks 56th of 214 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.31 trillion constant LCU | 2.92 trillion constant LCU | 396.06 billion constant LCU | Czechia |
| 2000s | 4.31 trillion constant LCU | 3.84 trillion constant LCU | 466.84 billion constant LCU | Czechia |
| 2010s | 5.38 trillion constant LCU | 4.64 trillion constant LCU | 741.58 billion constant LCU | Czechia |
| 2020s | 6.19 trillion constant LCU | 5.30 trillion constant LCU | 891.98 billion constant LCU | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp, Czechia or Sweden?
- Czechia, at 6.48 trillion constant LCU against 5.47 trillion constant LCU in Sweden as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp between Czechia and Sweden?
- 1.01 trillion constant LCU, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Sweden?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Sweden rank globally for gdp?
- Czechia ranks 53rd and Sweden ranks 56th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.