Croatia vs Zimbabwe: GDP
GDP over time
- Croatia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 74.26 billion constant LCU against 69.73 billion constant LCU in Croatia, a difference of 4.53 billion constant LCU.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Croatia ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35.40 billion constant LCU | 53.48 billion constant LCU | 18.09 billion constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 47.08 billion constant LCU | 43.68 billion constant LCU | 3.39 billion constant LCU | Croatia |
| 2010s | 51.30 billion constant LCU | 55.92 billion constant LCU | 4.62 billion constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 62.48 billion constant LCU | 65.13 billion constant LCU | 2.65 billion constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp, Croatia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 74.26 billion constant LCU against 69.73 billion constant LCU in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp between Croatia and Zimbabwe?
- 4.53 billion constant LCU, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zimbabwe?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Zimbabwe rank globally for gdp?
- Croatia ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.