Belarus vs Nicaragua: GDP (constant LCU) (Country official)
GDP (constant LCU) (Country official) over time
- Belarus
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 221.66 billion constant LCU against 213.25 billion constant LCU in Belarus, a difference of 8.41 billion constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 122nd and Nicaragua ranks 120th of 215 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 81.20 billion constant LCU | 77.59 billion constant LCU | 3.62 billion constant LCU | Belarus |
| 2000s | 124.94 billion constant LCU | 112.48 billion constant LCU | 12.46 billion constant LCU | Belarus |
| 2010s | 192.22 billion constant LCU | 162.27 billion constant LCU | 29.95 billion constant LCU | Belarus |
| 2020s | 203.47 billion constant LCU | 198.59 billion constant LCU | 4.88 billion constant LCU | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp, Belarus or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 221.66 billion constant LCU against 213.25 billion constant LCU in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp between Belarus and Nicaragua?
- 8.41 billion constant LCU, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nicaragua?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Nicaragua rank globally for gdp?
- Belarus ranks 122nd and Nicaragua ranks 120th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.