Eritrea vs Tonga: GDP (constant LCU), per capita
Eritrea
10,588 constant LCU per person
in 2011
Tonga
10,423 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Eritrea rank
183rd
Tonga rank
184th
GDP (constant LCU), per capita over time
- Eritrea
- Tonga
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 10,588 constant LCU per person against 10,423 constant LCU per person in Tonga, a difference of 165 constant LCU per person.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 183rd and Tonga ranks 184th of 213 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,456 constant LCU per person | 7,481 constant LCU per person | 3,975 constant LCU per person | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 11,345 constant LCU per person | 8,146 constant LCU per person | 3,199 constant LCU per person | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 10,254 constant LCU per person | 7,971 constant LCU per person | 2,283 constant LCU per person | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp (constant lcu), per capita, Eritrea or Tonga?
- Eritrea, at 10,588 constant LCU per person against 10,423 constant LCU per person in Tonga as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdp (constant lcu), per capita between Eritrea and Tonga?
- 165 constant LCU per person, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Tonga?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Tonga rank globally for gdp (constant lcu), per capita?
- Eritrea ranks 183rd and Tonga ranks 184th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
GDP (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.