Latvia vs Sudan: GDP
GDP over time
- Latvia
- Sudan
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 31.21 billion constant 2015 US$ against 30.07 billion constant 2015 US$ in Sudan, a difference of 1.14 billion constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sudan ahead.
Latvia ranks 105th and Sudan ranks 107th of 209 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.76 billion constant 2015 US$ | 27.17 billion constant 2015 US$ | 13.42 billion constant 2015 US$ | Sudan |
| 2000s | 21.35 billion constant 2015 US$ | 48.84 billion constant 2015 US$ | 27.48 billion constant 2015 US$ | Sudan |
| 2010s | 25.91 billion constant 2015 US$ | 52.63 billion constant 2015 US$ | 26.72 billion constant 2015 US$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 30.30 billion constant 2015 US$ | 39.87 billion constant 2015 US$ | 9.57 billion constant 2015 US$ | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp, Latvia or Sudan?
- Latvia, at 31.21 billion constant 2015 US$ against 30.07 billion constant 2015 US$ in Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp between Latvia and Sudan?
- 1.14 billion constant 2015 US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sudan?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Sudan rank globally for gdp?
- Latvia ranks 105th and Sudan ranks 107th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.