Curacao vs Greenland: GDP (constant 2015 US$)
GDP (constant 2015 US$) over time
- Curacao
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 2.84 billion constant 2015 US$ against 2.81 billion constant 2015 US$ in Curacao, a difference of 24.87 million constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Curacao ahead.
Curacao ranks 180th and Greenland ranks 179th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 2 and Greenland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.94 billion constant 2015 US$ | 2.06 billion constant 2015 US$ | 886.98 million constant 2015 US$ | Curacao |
| 2010s | 3.02 billion constant 2015 US$ | 2.55 billion constant 2015 US$ | 472.39 million constant 2015 US$ | Curacao |
| 2020s | 2.49 billion constant 2015 US$ | 2.78 billion constant 2015 US$ | 290.80 million constant 2015 US$ | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp, Curacao or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 2.84 billion constant 2015 US$ against 2.81 billion constant 2015 US$ in Curacao as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gdp between Curacao and Greenland?
- 24.87 million constant 2015 US$, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Greenland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Curacao and Greenland rank globally for gdp?
- Curacao ranks 180th and Greenland ranks 179th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.