Sweden vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Sweden
0.8714 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.8744 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sweden rank
58th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
56th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Sweden
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
02468196019922025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.8744 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8714 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sweden, a difference of 0.003 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 58th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 56th of 210 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 4 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 6.65 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.75 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 3.91 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sweden
1970s 3.29 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.73 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.56 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sweden
1980s 1.89 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.07 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8215 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sweden
1990s 1.19 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.87 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6806 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 1.15 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.37 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2229 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.9182 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9992 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0809 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.9441 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9057 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0384 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Sweden or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.8744 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8714 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sweden as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Sweden and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.003 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tanzania, United Republic of?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Sweden and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Sweden ranks 58th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 56th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/sweden/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/sweden/tanzania/">Sweden vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 14,390 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.