Pakistan vs Upper middle income: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Pakistan
1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Upper middle income
0.9359 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Pakistan rank
16th
Upper middle income rank
17th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Pakistan
  • Upper middle income
02468196019922025

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9359 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Upper middle income, a difference of 0.1141 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Upper middle income's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Upper middle income ahead.

Pakistan ranks 16th and Upper middle income ranks 17th of 210 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 4 and Upper middle income in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Upper middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 4.53 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 6.48 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.95 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Upper middle income
1970s 3.91 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 4.14 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2273 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Upper middle income
1980s 2.56 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.48 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0845 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pakistan
1990s 2.47 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.94 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.523 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2000s 1.48 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.6 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1124 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Upper middle income
2010s 1.07 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9756 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.095 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2020s 1.12 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9495 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1659 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Pakistan or Upper middle income?
Pakistan, at 1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9359 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Upper middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Pakistan and Upper middle income?
0.1141 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Upper middle income?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Pakistan and Upper middle income rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Pakistan ranks 16th and Upper middle income ranks 17th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Upper middle income: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/pakistan/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/pakistan/upper-middle-income/">Pakistan vs Upper middle income: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 14,390 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.