Libya vs Pre-demographic dividend: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Libya
1.34 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Pre-demographic dividend
0.9891 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Libya rank
7th
Pre-demographic dividend rank
5th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Libya
  • Pre-demographic dividend
0246810196019922025

How they compare

Libya currently reports 1.34 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9891 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.3509 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.4 times Pre-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 7th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 5th of 210 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 4 and Pre-demographic dividend in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Pre-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1960s 8.69 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 6.62 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.06 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Libya
1970s 3.79 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 3.91 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1233 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pre-demographic dividend
1980s 1.69 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.63 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0689 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Libya
1990s 1.82 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.87 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0491 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pre-demographic dividend
2000s 1.67 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.63 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0431 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Libya
2010s 0.9207 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9604 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0398 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pre-demographic dividend
2020s 1.24 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9304 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.308 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Libya or Pre-demographic dividend?
Libya, at 1.34 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9891 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Libya and Pre-demographic dividend?
0.3509 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Pre-demographic dividend?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Libya and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Libya ranks 7th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 5th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Pre-demographic dividend: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/libya/pre-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/libya/pre-demographic-dividend/">Libya vs Pre-demographic dividend: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 14,390 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.