Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Late-demographic dividend
0.9096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
0.9935 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend rank
21st
Rwanda rank
24th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Rwanda
02468196019922025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.9935 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0839 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Rwanda ahead.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 24th of 45 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Late-demographic dividend averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 5.1 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 7.24 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.13 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1970s 3.5 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 3.74 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2478 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1980s 2.5 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.47 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.03 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
1990s 2.11 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.31 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7974 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
2000s 1.66 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.35 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.302 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
2010s 0.9603 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9924 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0321 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0.9245 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9835 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.059 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Late-demographic dividend or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.9935 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
0.0839 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 24th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/rwanda/">Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 14,390 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.