Korea vs Late-demographic dividend: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Korea
1.03 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend
0.9096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Korea rank
18th
Late-demographic dividend rank
21st

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Korea
  • Late-demographic dividend
02.557.51012.5196019922025

How they compare

Korea currently reports 1.03 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.1204 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Korea's figure about 1.1 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Korea ahead.

Korea ranks 18th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 21st of 210 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 4 and Late-demographic dividend in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Late-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1960s 9.32 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 5.1 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 4.21 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Korea
1970s 4.95 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 3.5 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.45 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Korea
1980s 2.16 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.5 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3427 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
1990s 1.32 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.11 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7905 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
2000s 1.24 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.66 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4139 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
2010s 1.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9603 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0456 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Korea
2020s 1 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9245 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0786 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Korea or Late-demographic dividend?
Korea, at 1.03 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Korea and Late-demographic dividend?
0.1204 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Late-demographic dividend?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Korea and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Korea ranks 18th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 21st of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Late-demographic dividend: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/korea-rep/late-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/korea-rep/late-demographic-dividend/">Korea vs Late-demographic dividend: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 14,390 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.