What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Malaysia?

0.029 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Malaysia?

56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Malaysia: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Eswatini

0.9702 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Malaysia

0.9412 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Eswatini rank

27th

Malaysia rank

30th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Eswatini
Malaysia

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.9702 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9412 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Malaysia, a difference of 0.029 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malaysia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 27th and Malaysia ranks 30th of 210 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Malaysia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	2.45 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	3.28 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.8326 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
1980s	1.88 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.75 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1303 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
1990s	1.41 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.52 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1099 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
2000s	1.18 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.33 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1545 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
2010s	0.8893 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.9301 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0408 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
2020s	0.982 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.9789 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0031 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Malaysia?: Eswatini, at 0.9702 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9412 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Malaysia as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Malaysia?: 0.029 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Malaysia?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Malaysia rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?: Eswatini ranks 27th and Malaysia ranks 30th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Malaysia: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/malaysia/">Eswatini vs Malaysia: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 258 places, 14,390 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 26 August 2026

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.