Early-demographic dividend vs Eswatini: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Early-demographic dividend
0.8778 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Eswatini
0.9702 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
24th
Eswatini rank
27th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Eswatini
02468196019922025

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.9702 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8778 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0924 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 24th and Eswatini ranks 27th of 45 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 5 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 4.32 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.45 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.87 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
1980s 2.16 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.88 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2804 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
1990s 1.77 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.41 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3537 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
2000s 1.39 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.18 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2127 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
2010s 0.9504 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8893 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0611 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
2020s 0.926 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.982 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.056 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Early-demographic dividend or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.9702 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8778 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Early-demographic dividend and Eswatini?
0.0924 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Eswatini?
56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Eswatini rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 24th and Eswatini ranks 27th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Eswatini: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/eswatini/">Early-demographic dividend vs Eswatini: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 14,390 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.