What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between China and Rwanda?

0.0015 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for China and Rwanda?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Rwanda: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

China

0.995 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Rwanda

0.9935 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

China rank

23rd

Rwanda rank

24th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

China
Rwanda

How they compare

China currently reports 0.995 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9935 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0015 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Rwanda ahead.

China ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 24th of 210 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1960s	2.42 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	7.24 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	4.81 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
1970s	2.19 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	3.74 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.56 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
1980s	2.57 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.47 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.1 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	China
1990s	2.7 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.31 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.39 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	China
2000s	1.91 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.35 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.5585 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	China
2010s	1.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.9924 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0517 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	China
2020s	0.9571 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.9835 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0263 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, China or Rwanda?: China, at 0.995 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9935 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between China and Rwanda?: 0.0015 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Rwanda?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do China and Rwanda rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?: China ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 24th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Rwanda: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/rwanda/">China vs Rwanda: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 258 places, 14,390 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 26 August 2026

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.