China vs Early-demographic dividend: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

China
0.995 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend
0.8778 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
China rank
23rd
Early-demographic dividend rank
24th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • China
  • Early-demographic dividend
02468196019922025

How they compare

China currently reports 0.995 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8778 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.1172 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

China ranks 23rd and Early-demographic dividend ranks 24th of 210 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 5 and Early-demographic dividend in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Early-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1960s 2.42 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 6.63 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 4.2 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
1970s 2.19 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 4.32 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.13 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Early-demographic dividend
1980s 2.57 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.16 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4044 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP China
1990s 2.7 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.77 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9349 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP China
2000s 1.91 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.39 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5255 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP China
2010s 1.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9504 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0937 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP China
2020s 0.9571 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.926 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0311 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, China or Early-demographic dividend?
China, at 0.995 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8778 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between China and Early-demographic dividend?
0.1172 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Early-demographic dividend?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do China and Early-demographic dividend rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
China ranks 23rd and Early-demographic dividend ranks 24th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Early-demographic dividend: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/early-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/early-demographic-dividend/">China vs Early-demographic dividend: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 14,390 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.