Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Macau, China: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per capita

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
10,748 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Macau, China
66,444 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
13th
Macau, China rank
11th

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per capita over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Macau, China
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k198220032025

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 66,444 constant 2015 US$ per person against 10,748 constant 2015 US$ per person in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 55,696 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 6.2 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 13th and Macau, China ranks 11th of 45 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Macau, China Difference Ahead
1980s 5,460 constant 2015 US$ per person 29,940 constant 2015 US$ per person 24,481 constant 2015 US$ per person Macau, China
1990s 4,315 constant 2015 US$ per person 32,619 constant 2015 US$ per person 28,304 constant 2015 US$ per person Macau, China
2000s 5,705 constant 2015 US$ per person 46,419 constant 2015 US$ per person 40,714 constant 2015 US$ per person Macau, China
2010s 8,011 constant 2015 US$ per person 81,584 constant 2015 US$ per person 73,573 constant 2015 US$ per person Macau, China
2020s 9,898 constant 2015 US$ per person 49,797 constant 2015 US$ per person 39,900 constant 2015 US$ per person Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per capita, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 66,444 constant 2015 US$ per person against 10,748 constant 2015 US$ per person in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per capita between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Macau, China?
55,696 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Macau, China?
37 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2025.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Macau, China rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per capita?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 13th and Macau, China ranks 11th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Macau, China: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/macao-sar-china/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Macau, China: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 14,493 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.