Namibia vs Zambia: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Namibia
- Zambia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 1.08 billion current US$ against 1.05 billion current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 30.50 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zambia ahead.
Namibia ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 23rd of 49 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 254.89 million current US$ | 224.64 million current US$ | 30.25 million current US$ | Namibia |
| 2000s | 372.91 million current US$ | 451.75 million current US$ | 78.84 million current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 945.79 million current US$ | 784.90 million current US$ | 160.89 million current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Namibia or Zambia?
- Namibia, at 1.08 billion current US$ against 1.05 billion current US$ in Zambia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Namibia and Zambia?
- 30.50 million current US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zambia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Namibia and Zambia rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Namibia ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 23rd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in current U.S. dollars.