Gambia vs Liberia: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Gambia
- Liberia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 1.79 billion constant LCU against 1.42 billion constant LCU in Liberia, a difference of 376.94 million constant LCU.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.3 times Liberia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Liberia ahead.
Gambia ranks 33rd and Liberia ranks 35th of 38 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.54 billion constant LCU | 771.27 million constant LCU | 766.19 million constant LCU | Gambia |
| 2010s | 1.87 billion constant LCU | 1.36 billion constant LCU | 517.96 million constant LCU | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Gambia or Liberia?
- Gambia, at 1.79 billion constant LCU against 1.42 billion constant LCU in Liberia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Gambia and Liberia?
- 376.94 million constant LCU, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Liberia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Gambia and Liberia rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Gambia ranks 33rd and Liberia ranks 35th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.