Eritrea vs Sudan: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Eritrea
- Sudan
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 960.34 million constant LCU against 905.97 million constant LCU in Sudan, a difference of 54.37 million constant LCU.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 36th and Sudan ranks 37th of 38 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.12 billion constant LCU | 93.02 million constant LCU | 1.03 billion constant LCU | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 915.93 million constant LCU | 895.44 million constant LCU | 20.49 million constant LCU | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Eritrea or Sudan?
- Eritrea, at 960.34 million constant LCU against 905.97 million constant LCU in Sudan as of 2007.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Eritrea and Sudan?
- 54.37 million constant LCU, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2007.
- How do Eritrea and Sudan rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Eritrea ranks 36th and Sudan ranks 37th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.