Eritrea vs Eswatini: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Eritrea
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 960.34 million constant LCU against 667.50 million constant LCU in Eswatini, a difference of 292.84 million constant LCU.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.4 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eritrea ranks 36th and Eswatini ranks 38th of 38 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 749.28 million constant LCU | 1.04 billion constant LCU | 294.31 million constant LCU | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 915.93 million constant LCU | 773.37 million constant LCU | 142.55 million constant LCU | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Eritrea or Eswatini?
- Eritrea, at 960.34 million constant LCU against 667.50 million constant LCU in Eswatini as of 2007.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Eritrea and Eswatini?
- 292.84 million constant LCU, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Eswatini?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2007.
- How do Eritrea and Eswatini rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Eritrea ranks 36th and Eswatini ranks 38th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.