Egypt vs Malawi: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Egypt
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 42.09 billion constant LCU against 26.92 billion constant LCU in Egypt, a difference of 15.17 billion constant LCU.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.6 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 22nd and Malawi ranks 19th of 38 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.06 billion constant LCU | 35.31 billion constant LCU | 9.25 billion constant LCU | Malawi |
| 2010s | 26.92 billion constant LCU | 57.20 billion constant LCU | 30.28 billion constant LCU | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Egypt or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 42.09 billion constant LCU against 26.92 billion constant LCU in Egypt as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Egypt and Malawi?
- 15.17 billion constant LCU, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Malawi?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2010.
- How do Egypt and Malawi rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Egypt ranks 22nd and Malawi ranks 19th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.