Djibouti vs Mauritius: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Djibouti
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 14.41 billion constant LCU against 6.14 billion constant LCU in Djibouti, a difference of 8.27 billion constant LCU.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 2.3 times Djibouti's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 26th and Mauritius ranks 25th of 38 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.56 billion constant LCU | 10.27 billion constant LCU | 6.71 billion constant LCU | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 4.39 billion constant LCU | 13.08 billion constant LCU | 8.69 billion constant LCU | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Djibouti or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 14.41 billion constant LCU against 6.14 billion constant LCU in Djibouti as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Djibouti and Mauritius?
- 8.27 billion constant LCU, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Mauritius?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2006.
- How do Djibouti and Mauritius rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Djibouti ranks 26th and Mauritius ranks 25th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.