Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Lesotho: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 2.02 billion constant LCU against 1.48 billion constant LCU in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 536.31 million constant LCU.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.4 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 34th and Lesotho ranks 31st of 38 countries.
Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 2.02 billion constant LCU against 1.48 billion constant LCU in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Lesotho?
- 536.31 million constant LCU, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Lesotho?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Lesotho rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 34th and Lesotho ranks 31st of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.