Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Eritrea: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Eritrea
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 1.48 billion constant LCU against 960.34 million constant LCU in Eritrea, a difference of 518.83 million constant LCU.
That makes Congo, Democratic Republic of the's figure about 1.5 times Eritrea's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 34th and Eritrea ranks 36th of 38 countries.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Eritrea?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 1.48 billion constant LCU against 960.34 million constant LCU in Eritrea as of 1999.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Eritrea?
- 518.83 million constant LCU, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Eritrea?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Eritrea rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 34th and Eritrea ranks 36th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.