Comoros vs Namibia: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Comoros
- Namibia
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 5.59 billion constant LCU against 5.17 billion constant LCU in Namibia, a difference of 413.17 million constant LCU.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 27th and Namibia ranks 29th of 38 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 11.85 billion constant LCU | 1.00 billion constant LCU | 10.84 billion constant LCU | Comoros |
| 1990s | 4.95 billion constant LCU | 936.56 million constant LCU | 4.01 billion constant LCU | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Comoros or Namibia?
- Comoros, at 5.59 billion constant LCU against 5.17 billion constant LCU in Namibia as of 1998.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Comoros and Namibia?
- 413.17 million constant LCU, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1998.
- How do Comoros and Namibia rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Comoros ranks 27th and Namibia ranks 29th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.