Comoros vs Kenya: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Comoros
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 14.59 billion constant LCU against 5.59 billion constant LCU in Comoros, a difference of 9.00 billion constant LCU.
That makes Kenya's figure about 2.6 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Kenya ahead.
Comoros ranks 27th and Kenya ranks 24th of 38 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.46 billion constant LCU | 7.22 billion constant LCU | 1.76 billion constant LCU | Kenya |
| 1990s | 4.95 billion constant LCU | 7.63 billion constant LCU | 2.68 billion constant LCU | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Comoros or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 14.59 billion constant LCU against 5.59 billion constant LCU in Comoros as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Comoros and Kenya?
- 9.00 billion constant LCU, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Kenya?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 1998.
- How do Comoros and Kenya rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Comoros ranks 27th and Kenya ranks 24th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.