Cape Verde vs Djibouti: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Cape Verde
- Djibouti
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 6.14 billion constant LCU against 5.28 billion constant LCU in Cape Verde, a difference of 858.29 million constant LCU.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.2 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Djibouti ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 28th and Djibouti ranks 26th of 38 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.82 billion constant LCU | 3.56 billion constant LCU | 1.74 billion constant LCU | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 2.03 billion constant LCU | 4.39 billion constant LCU | 2.35 billion constant LCU | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Cape Verde or Djibouti?
- Djibouti, at 6.14 billion constant LCU against 5.28 billion constant LCU in Cape Verde as of 2006.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Cape Verde and Djibouti?
- 858.29 million constant LCU, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Djibouti?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2006.
- How do Cape Verde and Djibouti rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Cape Verde ranks 28th and Djibouti ranks 26th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.