Botswana vs Ghana: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Botswana
- Ghana
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 2.45 billion constant LCU against 1.92 billion constant LCU in Ghana, a difference of 528.54 million constant LCU.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.3 times Ghana's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 30th and Ghana ranks 32nd of 38 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.78 billion constant LCU | 1.02 billion constant LCU | 1.75 billion constant LCU | Botswana |
| 2010s | 2.85 billion constant LCU | 1.87 billion constant LCU | 979.18 million constant LCU | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Botswana or Ghana?
- Botswana, at 2.45 billion constant LCU against 1.92 billion constant LCU in Ghana as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Botswana and Ghana?
- 528.54 million constant LCU, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ghana?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2011.
- How do Botswana and Ghana rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Botswana ranks 30th and Ghana ranks 32nd of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.