Botswana vs Cabo Verde: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Botswana
- Cabo Verde
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 5.28 billion constant LCU against 2.45 billion constant LCU in Botswana, a difference of 2.83 billion constant LCU.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 2.2 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Botswana ranks 30th and Cabo Verde ranks 28th of 38 countries.
Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Cabo Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.81 billion constant LCU | 2.11 billion constant LCU | 301.65 million constant LCU | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 2.30 billion constant LCU | 2.42 billion constant LCU | 123.84 million constant LCU | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 3.24 billion constant LCU | 5.28 billion constant LCU | 2.04 billion constant LCU | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Botswana or Cabo Verde?
- Cabo Verde, at 5.28 billion constant LCU against 2.45 billion constant LCU in Botswana as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Botswana and Cabo Verde?
- 2.83 billion constant LCU, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cabo Verde?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
- How do Botswana and Cabo Verde rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Botswana ranks 30th and Cabo Verde ranks 28th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.