Benin vs Malawi: GDFI - public sector
GDFI - public sector over time
- Benin
- Malawi
How they compare
Benin currently reports 75.96 billion constant LCU against 42.09 billion constant LCU in Malawi, a difference of 33.87 billion constant LCU.
That makes Benin's figure about 1.8 times Malawi's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Benin has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 16th and Malawi ranks 19th of 38 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.57 billion constant LCU | 35.31 billion constant LCU | 32.26 billion constant LCU | Benin |
| 2010s | 75.96 billion constant LCU | 57.20 billion constant LCU | 18.75 billion constant LCU | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - public sector, Benin or Malawi?
- Benin, at 75.96 billion constant LCU against 42.09 billion constant LCU in Malawi as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gdfi - public sector between Benin and Malawi?
- 33.87 billion constant LCU, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Malawi?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2010.
- How do Benin and Malawi rank globally for gdfi - public sector?
- Benin ranks 16th and Malawi ranks 19th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - public sector (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure. Data are in constant local currency.