Mali vs Rwanda: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Mali
- Rwanda
How they compare
Mali currently reports 502.25 billion current LCU against 425.70 billion current LCU in Rwanda, a difference of 76.55 billion current LCU.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Mali ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 42 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 60.30 billion current LCU | 17.90 billion current LCU | 42.40 billion current LCU | Mali |
| 1990s | 107.99 billion current LCU | 27.33 billion current LCU | 80.66 billion current LCU | Mali |
| 2000s | 229.96 billion current LCU | 135.71 billion current LCU | 94.25 billion current LCU | Mali |
| 2010s | 476.79 billion current LCU | 402.53 billion current LCU | 74.26 billion current LCU | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Mali or Rwanda?
- Mali, at 502.25 billion current LCU against 425.70 billion current LCU in Rwanda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Mali and Rwanda?
- 76.55 billion current LCU, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Rwanda?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2011.
- How do Mali and Rwanda rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Mali ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data are in current local currency.