Malawi vs Mauritius: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Malawi
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 8.19 billion current LCU against 8.03 billion current LCU in Malawi, a difference of 168.35 million current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mauritius ahead.
Malawi ranks 33rd and Mauritius ranks 32nd of 42 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 136.27 million current LCU | 997.97 million current LCU | 861.70 million current LCU | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 2.24 billion current LCU | 2.48 billion current LCU | 239.83 million current LCU | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Malawi or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 8.19 billion current LCU against 8.03 billion current LCU in Malawi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Malawi and Mauritius?
- 168.35 million current LCU, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mauritius?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1999.
- How do Malawi and Mauritius rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Malawi ranks 33rd and Mauritius ranks 32nd of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data are in current local currency.