Eritrea vs Namibia: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Eritrea
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 3.97 billion current LCU against 3.02 billion current LCU in Eritrea, a difference of 950.54 million current LCU.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 37th and Namibia ranks 34th of 42 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 811.31 million current LCU | 1.18 billion current LCU | 369.19 million current LCU | Namibia |
| 2000s | 2.08 billion current LCU | 1.25 billion current LCU | 827.76 million current LCU | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Eritrea or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 3.97 billion current LCU against 3.02 billion current LCU in Eritrea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Eritrea and Namibia?
- 950.54 million current LCU, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Namibia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Eritrea and Namibia rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Eritrea ranks 37th and Namibia ranks 34th of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data are in current local currency.