Eritrea vs Eswatini: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Eritrea
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 3.02 billion current LCU against 1.46 billion current LCU in Eswatini, a difference of 1.56 billion current LCU.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 2.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eritrea ranks 37th and Eswatini ranks 40th of 42 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 811.31 million current LCU | 356.44 million current LCU | 454.87 million current LCU | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 2.08 billion current LCU | 903.93 million current LCU | 1.17 billion current LCU | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Eritrea or Eswatini?
- Eritrea, at 3.02 billion current LCU against 1.46 billion current LCU in Eswatini as of 2005.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Eritrea and Eswatini?
- 1.56 billion current LCU, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Eswatini?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Eritrea and Eswatini rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Eritrea ranks 37th and Eswatini ranks 40th of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data are in current local currency.