Chad vs Rwanda: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Chad
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 425.70 billion current LCU against 383.32 billion current LCU in Chad, a difference of 42.39 billion current LCU.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 42 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 22.39 billion current LCU | 10.36 billion current LCU | 12.03 billion current LCU | Chad |
| 1990s | 56.69 billion current LCU | 28.96 billion current LCU | 27.73 billion current LCU | Chad |
| 2000s | 210.41 billion current LCU | 135.71 billion current LCU | 74.70 billion current LCU | Chad |
| 2010s | 383.32 billion current LCU | 379.35 billion current LCU | 3.97 billion current LCU | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Chad or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 425.70 billion current LCU against 383.32 billion current LCU in Chad as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Chad and Rwanda?
- 42.39 billion current LCU, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Rwanda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2010.
- How do Chad and Rwanda rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Chad ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data are in current local currency.