Botswana vs Comoros: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Botswana
- Comoros
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 9.34 billion current LCU against 8.94 billion current LCU in Comoros, a difference of 404.10 million current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Comoros ahead.
Botswana ranks 30th and Comoros ranks 31st of 42 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.73 billion current LCU | 5.69 billion current LCU | 3.96 billion current LCU | Comoros |
| 2000s | 5.78 billion current LCU | 8.14 billion current LCU | 2.36 billion current LCU | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Botswana or Comoros?
- Botswana, at 9.34 billion current LCU against 8.94 billion current LCU in Comoros as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Botswana and Comoros?
- 404.10 million current LCU, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Comoros?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Botswana and Comoros rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Botswana ranks 30th and Comoros ranks 31st of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data are in current local currency.