Algeria vs Tanzania: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Algeria
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 3.35 trillion current LCU against 3.33 trillion current LCU in Algeria, a difference of 13.21 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania ahead.
Algeria ranks 3rd and Tanzania ranks 2nd of 42 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 130.82 billion current LCU | 147.32 billion current LCU | 16.50 billion current LCU | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 992.21 billion current LCU | 1.03 trillion current LCU | 41.07 billion current LCU | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 3.33 trillion current LCU | 2.68 trillion current LCU | 651.68 billion current LCU | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Algeria or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 3.35 trillion current LCU against 3.33 trillion current LCU in Algeria as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Algeria and Tanzania?
- 13.21 billion current LCU, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Tanzania?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Algeria and Tanzania rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Algeria ranks 3rd and Tanzania ranks 2nd of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data are in current local currency.