South Africa vs Togo: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- South Africa
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 139.03 billion constant LCU against 52.81 billion constant LCU in South Africa, a difference of 86.22 billion constant LCU.
That makes Togo's figure about 2.6 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1996 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 15th and Togo ranks 12th of 29 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 2 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 29.11 billion constant LCU | 27.35 billion constant LCU | 1.76 billion constant LCU | South Africa |
| 2000s | 41.72 billion constant LCU | 31.69 billion constant LCU | 10.03 billion constant LCU | South Africa |
| 2010s | 53.24 billion constant LCU | 130.86 billion constant LCU | 77.62 billion constant LCU | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, South Africa or Togo?
- Togo, at 139.03 billion constant LCU against 52.81 billion constant LCU in South Africa as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between South Africa and Togo?
- 86.22 billion constant LCU, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Togo?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do South Africa and Togo rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- South Africa ranks 15th and Togo ranks 12th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data; constant prices, local currencies.