Lesotho vs Namibia: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Lesotho
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 2.64 billion constant LCU against 2.02 billion constant LCU in Lesotho, a difference of 627.52 million constant LCU.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Lesotho's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Lesotho ranks 24th and Namibia ranks 22nd of 29 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 404.95 million constant LCU | 1.10 billion constant LCU | 697.05 million constant LCU | Namibia |
| 2000s | 508.93 million constant LCU | 1.66 billion constant LCU | 1.15 billion constant LCU | Namibia |
| 2010s | 1.72 billion constant LCU | 2.31 billion constant LCU | 594.44 million constant LCU | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Lesotho or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 2.64 billion constant LCU against 2.02 billion constant LCU in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Lesotho and Namibia?
- 627.52 million constant LCU, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Lesotho and Namibia rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Lesotho ranks 24th and Namibia ranks 22nd of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data; constant prices, local currencies.