Lesotho vs Morocco: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Lesotho
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 3.35 billion constant LCU against 2.02 billion constant LCU in Lesotho, a difference of 1.33 billion constant LCU.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.7 times Lesotho's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.
Lesotho ranks 24th and Morocco ranks 21st of 29 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 133.63 million constant LCU | 3.52 billion constant LCU | 3.39 billion constant LCU | Morocco |
| 1990s | 314.26 million constant LCU | 3.36 billion constant LCU | 3.04 billion constant LCU | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Lesotho or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 3.35 billion constant LCU against 2.02 billion constant LCU in Lesotho as of 1997.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Lesotho and Morocco?
- 1.33 billion constant LCU, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Morocco?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 1997.
- How do Lesotho and Morocco rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Lesotho ranks 24th and Morocco ranks 21st of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data; constant prices, local currencies.