Ghana vs Lesotho: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Ghana
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 2.02 billion constant LCU against 1.92 billion constant LCU in Ghana, a difference of 92.86 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 25th and Lesotho ranks 24th of 29 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.02 billion constant LCU | 815.87 million constant LCU | 206.65 million constant LCU | Ghana |
| 2010s | 1.87 billion constant LCU | 1.72 billion constant LCU | 150.78 million constant LCU | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Ghana or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 2.02 billion constant LCU against 1.92 billion constant LCU in Ghana as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Ghana and Lesotho?
- 92.86 million constant LCU, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Lesotho?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2011.
- How do Ghana and Lesotho rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Ghana ranks 25th and Lesotho ranks 24th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data; constant prices, local currencies.