Eritrea vs Lesotho: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Eritrea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 2.02 billion constant LCU against 960.34 million constant LCU in Eritrea, a difference of 1.06 billion constant LCU.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 2.1 times Eritrea's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 27th and Lesotho ranks 24th of 29 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 890.12 million constant LCU | 433.55 million constant LCU | 456.57 million constant LCU | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 915.93 million constant LCU | 338.12 million constant LCU | 577.81 million constant LCU | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Eritrea or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 2.02 billion constant LCU against 960.34 million constant LCU in Eritrea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 1.06 billion constant LCU, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2007.
- How do Eritrea and Lesotho rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Eritrea ranks 27th and Lesotho ranks 24th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data; constant prices, local currencies.