Eritrea vs Eswatini: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Eritrea
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 960.34 million constant LCU against 667.50 million constant LCU in Eswatini, a difference of 292.84 million constant LCU.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.4 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eritrea ranks 27th and Eswatini ranks 28th of 29 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 890.12 million constant LCU | 934.42 million constant LCU | 44.30 million constant LCU | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 915.93 million constant LCU | 773.37 million constant LCU | 142.55 million constant LCU | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Eritrea or Eswatini?
- Eritrea, at 960.34 million constant LCU against 667.50 million constant LCU in Eswatini as of 2007.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Eritrea and Eswatini?
- 292.84 million constant LCU, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Eswatini?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2007.
- How do Eritrea and Eswatini rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Eritrea ranks 27th and Eswatini ranks 28th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data; constant prices, local currencies.