Comoros vs Namibia: GDFI - general government

Comoros
5.59 billion constant LCU
in 1998
Namibia
2.64 billion constant LCU
in 2011
Comoros rank
19th
Namibia rank
22nd

GDFI - general government over time

  • Comoros
  • Namibia
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B199020002011

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 5.59 billion constant LCU against 2.64 billion constant LCU in Namibia, a difference of 2.94 billion constant LCU.

That makes Comoros's figure about 2.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 19th and Namibia ranks 22nd of 29 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdfi - general government, Comoros or Namibia?
Comoros, at 5.59 billion constant LCU against 2.64 billion constant LCU in Namibia as of 1998.
What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Comoros and Namibia?
2.94 billion constant LCU, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Namibia?
6 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1998.
How do Comoros and Namibia rank globally for gdfi - general government?
Comoros ranks 19th and Namibia ranks 22nd of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
GDFI - general government (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
29 places, 723 data points, 1965–2011
Last refreshed

General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data; constant prices, local currencies.