Chad vs Togo: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Chad
- Togo
How they compare
Chad currently reports 222.89 billion constant LCU against 139.03 billion constant LCU in Togo, a difference of 83.86 billion constant LCU.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.6 times Togo's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 9th and Togo ranks 12th of 29 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 70.90 billion constant LCU | 27.35 billion constant LCU | 43.55 billion constant LCU | Chad |
| 2000s | 115.65 billion constant LCU | 30.89 billion constant LCU | 84.76 billion constant LCU | Chad |
| 2010s | 236.09 billion constant LCU | 130.86 billion constant LCU | 105.23 billion constant LCU | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Chad or Togo?
- Chad, at 222.89 billion constant LCU against 139.03 billion constant LCU in Togo as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Chad and Togo?
- 83.86 billion constant LCU, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Togo?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Chad and Togo rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Chad ranks 9th and Togo ranks 12th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data; constant prices, local currencies.