Cameroon vs Togo: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Cameroon
- Togo
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 197.95 billion constant LCU against 139.03 billion constant LCU in Togo, a difference of 58.92 billion constant LCU.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.4 times Togo's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 10th and Togo ranks 12th of 29 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 101.16 billion constant LCU | 27.35 billion constant LCU | 73.81 billion constant LCU | Cameroon |
| 2000s | 177.31 billion constant LCU | 23.68 billion constant LCU | 153.63 billion constant LCU | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Cameroon or Togo?
- Cameroon, at 197.95 billion constant LCU against 139.03 billion constant LCU in Togo as of 2007.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Cameroon and Togo?
- 58.92 billion constant LCU, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Togo?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2007.
- How do Cameroon and Togo rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Cameroon ranks 10th and Togo ranks 12th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data; constant prices, local currencies.