Cameroon vs Congo: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Cameroon
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 335.75 billion constant LCU against 197.95 billion constant LCU in Cameroon, a difference of 137.80 billion constant LCU.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.7 times Cameroon's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Cameroon ahead.
Cameroon ranks 10th and Congo ranks 8th of 29 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 236.02 billion constant LCU | 20.50 billion constant LCU | 215.52 billion constant LCU | Cameroon |
| 1990s | 117.48 billion constant LCU | 26.29 billion constant LCU | 91.19 billion constant LCU | Cameroon |
| 2000s | 177.31 billion constant LCU | 91.59 billion constant LCU | 85.72 billion constant LCU | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Cameroon or Congo?
- Congo, at 335.75 billion constant LCU against 197.95 billion constant LCU in Cameroon as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Cameroon and Congo?
- 137.80 billion constant LCU, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Congo?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2007.
- How do Cameroon and Congo rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Cameroon ranks 10th and Congo ranks 8th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data; constant prices, local currencies.