Cabo Verde vs Namibia: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Cabo Verde
- Namibia
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 5.28 billion constant LCU against 2.64 billion constant LCU in Namibia, a difference of 2.64 billion constant LCU.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 2.0 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 20th and Namibia ranks 22nd of 29 countries.
Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.06 billion constant LCU | 1.10 billion constant LCU | 956.92 million constant LCU | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 2.42 billion constant LCU | 1.66 billion constant LCU | 767.79 million constant LCU | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 5.28 billion constant LCU | 1.98 billion constant LCU | 3.30 billion constant LCU | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Cabo Verde or Namibia?
- Cabo Verde, at 5.28 billion constant LCU against 2.64 billion constant LCU in Namibia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Cabo Verde and Namibia?
- 2.64 billion constant LCU, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Namibia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2010.
- How do Cabo Verde and Namibia rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Cabo Verde ranks 20th and Namibia ranks 22nd of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data; constant prices, local currencies.