Botswana vs Cape Verde: GDFI - general government
GDFI - general government over time
- Botswana
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 5.28 billion constant LCU against 2.45 billion constant LCU in Botswana, a difference of 2.83 billion constant LCU.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 2.2 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Botswana ranks 23rd and Cape Verde ranks 20th of 29 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Cape Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.81 billion constant LCU | 2.11 billion constant LCU | 301.65 million constant LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 2.30 billion constant LCU | 2.42 billion constant LCU | 123.84 million constant LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 3.24 billion constant LCU | 5.28 billion constant LCU | 2.04 billion constant LCU | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdfi - general government, Botswana or Cape Verde?
- Cape Verde, at 5.28 billion constant LCU against 2.45 billion constant LCU in Botswana as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gdfi - general government between Botswana and Cape Verde?
- 2.83 billion constant LCU, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cape Verde?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
- How do Botswana and Cape Verde rank globally for gdfi - general government?
- Botswana ranks 23rd and Cape Verde ranks 20th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GDFI - general government (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government’s gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets, by local, state or central government. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 93SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of government consumption expenditure. Data; constant prices, local currencies.