Netherlands Antilles vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita

Netherlands Antilles
68.72 kilograms per year per capita
in 2009
Tanzania, United Republic of
67.18 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Netherlands Antilles rank
122nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
124th

Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Netherlands Antilles
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Netherlands Antilles currently reports 68.72 kilograms per year per capita against 67.18 kilograms per year per capita in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 1.54 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Netherlands Antilles ahead.

Netherlands Antilles ranks 122nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 124th of 192 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Netherlands Antilles averaged higher in 4 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Antilles Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 96.3 kilograms per year per capita 53.19 kilograms per year per capita 43.11 kilograms per year per capita Netherlands Antilles
1970s 115.9 kilograms per year per capita 49.96 kilograms per year per capita 65.94 kilograms per year per capita Netherlands Antilles
1980s 141.73 kilograms per year per capita 45.61 kilograms per year per capita 96.12 kilograms per year per capita Netherlands Antilles
1990s 106.32 kilograms per year per capita 38.99 kilograms per year per capita 67.34 kilograms per year per capita Netherlands Antilles
2000s 63.55 kilograms per year per capita 70.06 kilograms per year per capita 6.51 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita, Netherlands Antilles or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Netherlands Antilles, at 68.72 kilograms per year per capita against 67.18 kilograms per year per capita in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2009.
What is the difference in fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita between Netherlands Antilles and Tanzania, United Republic of?
1.54 kilograms per year per capita, with Netherlands Antilles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands Antilles and Tanzania, United Republic of?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2009.
How do Netherlands Antilles and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for fruit consumption vs. gdp per capita?
Netherlands Antilles ranks 122nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 124th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands Antilles vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/netherlands-antilles/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/netherlands-antilles/tanzania/">Netherlands Antilles vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit consumption vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.